|
|
Post by Rankles on Mar 21, 2004 13:17:03 GMT
You are techically correct, but i've made adaptions to the origial 'hoax' character, thus making it mine!
|
|
|
|
Post by supersonicjim on Mar 21, 2004 13:17:09 GMT
yep he was hoaxified by that magazine, and you are stealing it and rudely telling us he is yours.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rankles on Mar 21, 2004 13:20:33 GMT
woteva, I made adaptions to the original 'hoax' character - therefore it is not the same, thus making it mine.
y'all have a good day now.
|
|
|
|
Post by supersonicjim on Mar 21, 2004 13:23:22 GMT
you should have given it a name instead of plagerizing the mags name for him.
|
|
|
|
Post by ChaosX3 on Mar 21, 2004 13:24:22 GMT
Hold up- the adaption of the character is yours, no doubt, but the original concept of the character is public, therefore the original doesn't belong to you.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rankles on Mar 21, 2004 14:06:22 GMT
you should have given it a name instead of plagerizing the mags name for him. i've given it to names - one is Rankles, the other is Virus |
|
|
|
Post by Omega Wants Cake on Mar 21, 2004 14:49:45 GMT
Why two names?
|
|
|
|
Post by Rankles on Mar 21, 2004 14:53:36 GMT
becuae my adaption is like a matrix version, so it neede a matrix name.
|
|
|
|
Post by Omega Wants Cake on Mar 21, 2004 15:14:17 GMT
Out of curiosity. Are you this Guy
bAD LINK
Because the Rankles listed on the page only slightly resembes the Rankles in the Mag.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rankles on Mar 21, 2004 15:45:26 GMT
I am indeed that guy. My rankles was based from the 'hoax', I hadn't seen the picture on the competition page untl today. plus that is my very old site and also my very old version of rankles.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spydaman on Mar 21, 2004 16:12:42 GMT
You can't come on here and claim a character you didn't create is yours and for us to stop talking about AND making sprites of. For starters, the Rankles on your page is just a green Knuckles. The original concept of Rankles is NOT yours, despite having made an adaptation of that character. That's like someone taking Sonic, chopping off his spikes and then telling everyone else to stop talking about Sonic because it's his now. We are not talking about "your" Rankles and no one was ever aware of "your" so you can't tell us to stop talking about it. Some people  |
|
|
|
Post by Rankles on Mar 21, 2004 16:20:08 GMT
well, it's the fact that my character is called rankles that bothers me that you guys are talking about it. i'm not trying to claim the original character, im just saying that ur having a disscussion about a character which I use as my own and I would like you to stop. Some People |
|
JJ
Script Hume
Bit of a hack, really.
Posts: 4,902
|
Post by JJ on Mar 21, 2004 16:34:01 GMT
That's really dumb. Most of us have never heard of YOUR Rankles. We only know of the magazine hoax....and that is where our discussion is based. We are remembering a great hoax from the past, not your character. Rankles the otter as your fan-character? That's very funny and pathetic.  |
|
|
|
Post by supersonicjim on Mar 21, 2004 16:34:02 GMT
you can't come here bossing us around, if you wanted to make a fan character you should have named him yourself and not just rip off someone else.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spydaman on Mar 21, 2004 16:35:36 GMT
Ok. For starters, no one here is claiming ownership of Rankles so you have no place being bothered about anything.
Second, the original Rankles was created in 1994. Judging by your comics, you didn't start using the name Rankles until 2002. Almost 10 years later.
Thirdly, your Rankles is not the topic of conversation, therefore you have no right to dictate how or what we talk about. And you said your Rankles has two names. Use the other one and stop trying to claim something as your own when it's not.
|
|
|
|
Post by supersonicjim on Mar 21, 2004 16:40:50 GMT
I am indeed that guy. My rankles was based from the 'hoax', I hadn't seen the picture on the competition page untl today. plus that is my very old site and also my very old version of rankles. and you have pornography on there. |
|
JJ
Script Hume
Bit of a hack, really.
Posts: 4,902
|
Post by JJ on Mar 21, 2004 16:47:08 GMT
Hey mod-man, you might want to erase that link then, seeing as it contains offensive material.  |
|
