|
Post by hyperknucks on Nov 6, 2004 22:20:43 GMT
Yessss my couson is staying round my house for a few nights and were gonna play 2 player lord of th rings untill are heads blow off he's wicked at it so im practicing I aint played it in ages.
what do you think of the game
|
|
|
Post by supershadow on Nov 7, 2004 0:54:29 GMT
Which one are you talking about
|
|
|
Post by hyperknucks on Nov 7, 2004 8:51:28 GMT
im playing with my couson on the return of the king but you can chat about any of the games
|
|
|
Post by Sin on Nov 7, 2004 10:46:37 GMT
I'm planning on getting the Third Age (is that it's name?) sometime. That looks pretty good.
|
|
|
Post by hyperknucks on Nov 7, 2004 11:43:22 GMT
Yep im getting that even if I have to die trying
You can fight that fire demon
The third age is all three games in one and it has a lot more features then the other one's seperate
sadly I only have a tenner
|
|
|
Post by Matt on Nov 7, 2004 12:13:42 GMT
i have many tolkien games
the hobbit the felowship of the ring the two towers the return of the king battle for middle earth [need] the third age *just relsieses he's almost as obsised with tolkien as he is with sonic.*
|
|
|
Post by hyperknucks on Nov 7, 2004 12:48:34 GMT
Its a great game I only have
the return of the king [need] the fellowship [need] two towers [need] hobbit [need] battle for middle earth [need] third age
|
|
|
Post by Matt on Nov 7, 2004 12:54:32 GMT
well I tell you now that the hobbit and the fellowship are slow paced and often boaring games that have nothing to do with the movie only that book and to anyone less then a hardcore fan not really worthy of attention, so if your a big fan of the books it a good games other wise you may find your self dissapointed, the two towers is also quite ovoiusly the game before the return of the king the style is exaclty the same though at a lesser devloped stage, so when going back it's a good game however don't expect agathing that isn't in return of the king
|
|
|
Post by hyperknucks on Nov 7, 2004 13:13:28 GMT
I agree I have played the hobbit and the fellowship I find it snoresville
Yay my cousons here he says hello dudes
|
|
|
Post by Matt on Nov 7, 2004 13:52:15 GMT
and so I say hello dude right back. so what are you doing two payer co-op? i my opnion that is probably the best faeture of the second e.a game.
must by the r.t.s brillance of the third age
|
|
|
Post by hyperknucks on Nov 7, 2004 15:27:41 GMT
Me and my couson have took a break are eyes are burning and we have put spoons in the freezer to put over are eyes arrrrgh
|
|
|
Post by Matt on Nov 7, 2004 15:37:43 GMT
lol sound like a good setion then, were about on the game are you at the momnet and on what difficulty level
|
|
|
Post by hyperknucks on Nov 7, 2004 17:54:17 GMT
Well I was on plenita fields on hard but I have completed it now
|
|
|
Post by madhair60 on Nov 7, 2004 19:41:41 GMT
Third Age is woefully poor. It is NOTHING LIKE the Two Towers or ROTK EA games. Which pwn.
Speaking of which, ROTK kicks my arse. It's nails.
|
|
|
Post by hyperknucks on Nov 7, 2004 19:47:27 GMT
So you mean its hard
|
|
|
Post by Matt on Nov 8, 2004 23:12:42 GMT
rotk and tt were brilliant games are brillantly spawned from the movies, dark clours and brillant texture and fluid and simple combo and fight system, the chracter selction works well and the co-op in rork doesn't fail in any way to work as well as single player.
however universals and sierra's book game attmeps proves once again that a brande tie in does not make a game, the ideas are to well thought up and detract from the book far to much but not I a way that adds more action, and a string a bad missions and poor voice acting make thing bad, however I have struggled though all the games and plaesed to say I have.
|
|
|
Post by 321boom on Nov 10, 2004 19:26:58 GMT
Yessss my couson is staying round my house for a few nights and were gonna play 2 player lord of th rings until are heads blow off he's wicked at it so im practicing I aint played it in ages. what do you think of the game The fellowship: I loved this game. This game had ingeniou levels and started with a great level. Even I have a gamecube, I think this game plays better on PS2. The controls work a lot better. I have only played this game once and I already know that it's ingenious! This game is so much different from the others. It starts off with a level with no action but a level that gets you into the story. A lot of people I know get stuck on that bit. Like I said, this game is a lot different from the others. The Two Towers: This game starts off with a great action level which I think is ingeniously set out. I also think the PS2 plays better on this game than the GC does. Again, I have only played this once, and I was so in to it I nearly completed it on my first try (this was at my friends house). The Return of the King: The first level (again) was a brilliant introduction. Specially when you have to blow up the stuff on the bridge. I thought the level where you had to knock down the dam lacks adventure, since all you have to do is kill the orcs and make sure the dam get's destroyed. Otherwise I think that the games are all ellaborately original, specialy the "Pelanor Fields", this level was ingenious. I think the last level is ingenious to, since you can't actually hurt Gollem but you have to knock him off a number of times. I own this game on the GC so I have know vews on wheather this plays well on the PS2. To sum that all up...they're all great games. I heard there are some new Lord of the Rings game(s?) that is a bit like Final Fantasy. Maybe I'm being a bit over the top about the Lord of the Rings but I love 'em!.
|
|
|
Post by Rory. on Nov 22, 2004 20:19:03 GMT
i dont like the games much
|
|
|
Post by Matt on Nov 22, 2004 20:20:37 GMT
balspamy who adre you, must kill you. seriously whats are worng with the lotr games
|
|
|
Post by madhair60 on Nov 23, 2004 11:56:16 GMT
They're repetitive. Does anyone know any adjectives aside from "Ingenious"?
|
|
|
Post by 321boom on Nov 26, 2004 18:10:24 GMT
They're repetitive. Does anyone know any adjectives aside from "Ingenious"? Erm...[oneword]pure genious[/oneword]?
|
|