|
Post by MentalAnalysis on Nov 2, 2010 23:30:28 GMT
I think the title for the 3rd movie is pretty bad. :\
|
|
|
Post by Devo DrakeFox on Nov 3, 2010 10:49:22 GMT
Let's see you do better. In regards to Forever, Jim Carrey as the Riddler was its only real saving grace (let's face it, Carrey can make anything good ;D). They wrecked Two-Face's character completely, he seemed more like the Joker with all that crazy laughter. Two-Face doesn't do evil laughter! X<
|
|
|
Post by Samface on Nov 3, 2010 11:52:13 GMT
To be fair, Two-Face was arguably not that well-known due to the fact that he didn't appear in the '60s show (as far as I can remember). When I saw the movie in the cinema I'd certainly never heard of him. All I saw was Jim Carrey and Tommy Lee Jones having a delightful Battle o' Hams.
But yeah, going back to it now it's a bit facepalmy seeing Harvey flip his coin multiple times until he gets the result he wants.
|
|
|
Post by Nam on Nov 3, 2010 17:06:27 GMT
To be fair, Two-Face was arguably not that well-known due to the fact that he didn't appear in the '60s show (as far as I can remember). When I saw the movie in the cinema I'd certainly never heard of him. All I saw was Jim Carrey and Tommy Lee Jones having a delightful Battle o' Hams I'm pretty sure Two Face came about in the films due to his popularity in Batman The Animated Series, though I can't say for certain. Most the characters in the films tend to be prominent in the cartoons, and it's probably the cartoons that gave the Batman villains such prominence in to the nineties audiences. Hence you can probably guess the villain in this film from who's prominent in The Batman, and Batman The Brave And The Bold, depening on which of them is realistic to portray, and wasn't explicitedly refered to or used in Batman Begins and The Dark Knight.
|
|
|
Post by madhair60 on Nov 4, 2010 13:51:01 GMT
On that basis I wouldn't be surprised if it was Ra's Al Ghul. A new Ra's Al Ghul, anyway. It's a trilogy as far as I know, and it would be nice to see it come full circle.
|
|
|
Post by Samface on Nov 4, 2010 14:17:19 GMT
I'm increasingly suspicious that Talia (sp?) will turn up, personally.
|
|
|
Post by madhair60 on Nov 4, 2010 16:18:36 GMT
Misread that as "Tails".
Which would be [censored]ing brilliant.
|
|
|
Post by The Shad on Nov 4, 2010 16:35:40 GMT
Owlman for the bad guy!
|
|
|
Post by Baron Canier on Nov 5, 2010 13:45:12 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Devo DrakeFox on Nov 7, 2010 11:32:35 GMT
Genius. ;D
On a semi-related note, James Woods is awesome. This is factual and not open for debate.
|
|
|
Post by rj on Nov 10, 2010 2:45:07 GMT
The other problem is that introducing Thomas Elliot and then revealing him to be a villain within the same film would be far too obvious. Audiences would be able to guess almost immediatly. They'd need to get a bit inventive. make hush's secret identity ra's al ghul
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Nov 10, 2010 10:33:05 GMT
Misread that as "Tails". Which would be [censored]ing brilliant.
|
|
|
Post by madhair60 on Nov 10, 2010 11:00:35 GMT
"Now suck it"
|
|
Pitt
Script Hume
Ungrateful Sonic Saxophonist
If Lando dies, I'll destroy your planet!
Posts: 7,007
|
Post by Pitt on Nov 10, 2010 12:57:37 GMT
Would explain exactly what part of the Dark Knight "rises", I suppose.
|
|
|
Post by WinterFlames on Nov 10, 2010 14:22:04 GMT
I think the title for the 3rd movie is pretty bad. :\ Well to be fair, alliteration aside, "Batman Begins" is rather rubbish really.
|
|
|
Post by Alex on Nov 18, 2010 17:01:36 GMT
Latest rumours are that Tom Hardy will not be playing Killer Croc, but rather Doctor Strange. No, not that one. This one.
|
|
|
Post by Samface on Nov 19, 2010 19:07:04 GMT
He's going to be playing a major part in Arkham City, innee? Makes sense.
|
|
|
Post by Alex on Nov 19, 2010 19:50:56 GMT
To go with the Strange rumours, there's also talk that the film will be based on 'Prey' - which fits with both the rumours of Strange and Catwoman.
|
|
|
Post by The Shad on Jan 19, 2011 17:44:50 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Devo DrakeFox on Jan 19, 2011 18:20:22 GMT
Bane? Sweet!
|
|
|
Post by Samface on Jan 20, 2011 12:04:18 GMT
Hardy as Bane is an eminently sensible decision. Hathaway as Kyle (note that it doesn't specify Catwoman...) is interesting: I've only seen her in Alice in Wonderland, so I can't really comment on whether she'll be good or not.
I kind of hope she is Catwoman, as one of my friends has a massive crush on her and it'll be entertaining to see his reaction to her strutting around in skintight latex. I predict embolisms.
|
|
|
Post by Arch_one_zero_one on Jan 20, 2011 12:26:27 GMT
I gather that she is Catwoman, since she's supposed to have 'filled the vigilante role of a fugitive Batman', which is what brings him out of hiding. I don't know though, Anne Hathaway, while hot... I just don't see it for this kind of film. I've been wrong before though - case in point; Ledger as the Joker.
Bane - I'd like to see him done properly for once, so I hope Nolan does him justice.
|
|
|
Post by Baron Canier on Jan 20, 2011 12:34:19 GMT
I kind of hope she is Catwoman, as one of my friends has a massive crush on her and it'll be entertaining to see his reaction to her strutting around in skintight latex. Hopefully she'll look something like this. Bane, Hugo Strange and Catwoman. Never thought I'd see that mix.
|
|
|
Post by Devo DrakeFox on Jan 20, 2011 14:49:37 GMT
I imagine Catwoman's costume will look a little more cheap compared to Batman's; difference in occupations and all.
|
|
|
Post by The KKM on Jan 20, 2011 15:12:06 GMT
Compare: to I personally she's the actress we have that looks more like Hepburn. apart from maybe that girl from Amèlie Poulain. Anyways, they can now adapt the best Catwoman ever:
|
|